The 2012 Volvo S60 racked up 121 NHTSA complaints and four safety recalls. The 2017, built on the same basic platform six years later, drew 15 complaints and zero. Same generation, same nameplate, a completely different car to own. Volvo swapped this generation's entire engine lineup twice in seven years, once at launch and again mid-cycle, and each swap left a visible fingerprint in the complaint data. If you're shopping the second-generation S60, which engine and which model year you land on matters more than the trim badge on the trunk.
This Generation at a Glance
Volvo redesigned the S60 for the 2011 model year on the P3 platform, the same architecture underneath the XC60, S80, and V70 of that era. It replaced a boxier, first-generation S60 with a lower, wider sedan built around Volvo's "floating" center stack. The car ran through 2018 in the US before Volvo moved to the third-generation S60 for 2019, built in South Carolina on an entirely different platform not covered here.
Two engine transitions split this generation into three distinct eras. From 2011 through most of 2016, the S60 used a 2.5L turbocharged inline-5 (T5, front-wheel drive) or a 3.0L turbocharged inline-6 (T6, all-wheel drive), both inherited from the era when Volvo shared engineering with Ford. Starting mid-2015, Volvo phased in its new in-house Drive-E four-cylinder family, and by 2017 the inline-5 and inline-6 were gone entirely, replaced by a 2.0L turbo four across every trim, including the Polestar flagship. That switch wasn't just a badge change. Drive-E engines are lighter, run a timing chain instead of a belt, and pair with a new 8-speed automatic instead of the older 6-speed, and the complaint data below shows the difference it made.
| Powertrain | Years Available | HP/TQ | Transmission | MPG (Combined) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5L Turbo I5 (T5, FWD) | 2011-2016 | 250 hp / 266 lb-ft | 6-speed automatic | 23-24 |
| 3.0L Turbo I6 (T6, AWD) | 2011-2016 | 300-325 hp / 325 lb-ft | 6-speed automatic | 21 |
| 3.0L Turbo I6 (Polestar, AWD) | 2015-2016 | 345 hp / 369 lb-ft | 6-speed automatic | 21 |
| 2.0L Turbo I4 Drive-E (T5, FWD/AWD) | 2015.5-2018 | 240-250 hp / 258 lb-ft | 8-speed automatic | 27-30 |
| 2.0L Twin-Charged I4 Drive-E (T6, AWD) | 2015.5-2018 | 302 hp / 295 lb-ft | 8-speed automatic | 25-26 |
| 2.0L Twin-Charged I4 (Polestar, AWD) | 2017-2018 | 362 hp / 347 lb-ft | 8-speed automatic | 23 |
Current pricing and inventory: Volvo S60 market data, with per-year pages for 2012, 2013, 2015, 2016, and 2017.
Powertrain & Trim Breakdown
2.5L Turbo Inline-5 (T5, 2011-2016)
The T5's 2.5L turbo five-cylinder was Volvo's workhorse engine for over a decade, and forum consensus on SwedeSpeed and Matthews Volvo Site is mixed on how it ages. Some owners report clean runs past 150,000 miles with routine maintenance. Others describe oil consumption approaching a quart per 1,000 miles, with piston ring wear as the suspected cause on the worst examples. The engine also uses a timing belt, not a chain, on a 120,000-mile or 10-year interval, whichever comes first. The belt degrades with age regardless of mileage, so a low-mileage 2012 with an original belt is still a belt job waiting to happen. Shops quote $850 to $1,200 for a combined belt and water pump service, since the water pump sits behind the belt and most mechanics replace both at once.
A separate and more common failure is the PCV system's oil trap. The membrane inside hardens and cracks over time, letting oil mist into the intake and causing a whistling sound, rough idle, a check engine light, and, in bad cases, an oil leak at the crank or cam seals. Repair costs run $139 to $475 depending on whether it's a standalone valve or a trap integrated into the valve cover. None of this makes the T5 a bad engine to own. It makes it one where maintenance history matters more than most, since the difference between a well-serviced example and a neglected one shows up directly in oil consumption and belt condition rather than anything visible on a test drive.
3.0L Turbo Inline-6 (T6, 2011-2016)
The T6's inline-6 has the best reputation in the P3 family. FCP Euro's buyer's guide for the platform calls it "among the most robust and reliable" engines Volvo built during this era, and that sentiment repeats across SwedeSpeed threads describing 150,000-plus mile examples with nothing beyond routine service. It runs a timing chain, so there's no belt interval to budget for, and owners comparing notes on TrueDelta's pros-and-cons pages consistently list the six-cylinder's smoothness and pull as the car's best feature.
The tradeoff is the Haldex all-wheel-drive system. Volvo ran a dealer service campaign (S49642) covering model year 2013-2015 AWD models to recalibrate the Differential Electronic Module after owners reported gradually degrading rear-wheel torque, a software issue rather than a hardware failure. This is a Volvo service campaign, not an NHTSA safety recall, so it won't show up in a VIN-based recall check. Ask whether it was done. Beyond that, expect "AWD malfunction" or "anti-skid service required" warnings on cars with neglected Haldex fluid, which Volvo specifies changing periodically and which owners frequently skip since it isn't part of a basic oil-change routine. A blown fuse or a failing Haldex pump can trigger the same warnings, so a code scan before you buy is worth more than guessing from the dash light alone.
2.0L Turbo Drive-E (T5, 2015.5-2018)
Volvo's Drive-E family replaced the inline-5 starting mid-2015, and by 2017 it was the only engine offered in the S60. The 2.0L turbo four in T5 trim makes 240 to 250 hp depending on year and drivetrain, pairs with a new 8-speed automatic, and runs a timing chain instead of a belt, removing the biggest scheduled-maintenance cost of the earlier engine. NHTSA complaint volume backs up the improvement: engine-related complaints in CarScout's data drop from 43 in 2012 to 13 in 2015 and just 1 in 2017.
Because 2015 and 2016 were transition years, cars built in the same model year can carry either the old inline-5/inline-6 or the new Drive-E four depending on production date. CarScout's EPA fuel economy data for 2016 lists both a 23-mpg 2.5L five-cylinder AWD trim and a 30-mpg 2.0L Drive-E FWD trim in the same model year. Check the door jamb build sticker or the engine badge, not just the year on the title.
2.0L Twin-Charged Drive-E (T6, 2015.5-2018)
The T6 Drive-E pairs a turbocharger and a supercharger on the same 2.0L block to make 302 hp with AWD standard, replacing the inline-6 by the end of 2016. It's a more complex engine than the naturally-aspirated-feeling I6 it replaced, but the added complexity hasn't shown up as a reliability gap in complaint data. Watch for the same PCV/oil trap symptoms described on the T5, since some forum reports describe the issue carrying over to the newer four-cylinder as well.
Polestar (2015-2018)
Volvo's factory performance trim changed engines mid-run just like the rest of the lineup. The 2015-2016 Polestar used a tuned version of the 3.0L inline-6 at 345 hp and 369 lb-ft, the strongest engine offered in this generation's first half. For 2017-2018, Polestar switched to the twin-charged 2.0L four at 362 hp and 347 lb-ft, actually more powerful than the six it replaced. Both versions add upgraded brakes, a firmer tuned suspension, and Polestar-specific badging. Parts and specialty service cost more than a standard T6, and the low production numbers mean fewer independent shops have direct experience with the car.
S60 Cross Country (2016-2018)
Volvo's raised-suspension variant arrived for 2016 with the outgoing 2.5L inline-5 and a 6-speed automatic, then switched to the 2.0L Drive-E four and 8-speed automatic for 2017, matching the same transition timeline as the rest of the lineup. It sits about 2.5 inches higher than a standard S60, runs standard AWD, and adds skid plates and larger tires meant more for gravel roads and snow-covered driveways than serious off-roading. It's a low-volume variant, which means fewer used examples to choose from and fewer independent mechanics who've seen one specifically, though the mechanicals underneath are shared with the standard AWD Drive-E cars.
Trim Levels
| Trim | Key Equipment | What to Pay Extra For |
|---|---|---|
| T5 | Base equipment, FWD, cloth or leatherette seats | Premier package for leather and moonroof |
| T5 AWD (2015+) | All-wheel drive paired with the Drive-E four | Worth it in snow states, minimal mpg penalty |
| T6 AWD | Standard all-wheel drive, more standard tech | The generation's best balance of power and reliability |
| T6 R-Design | Sport suspension, bigger brakes, unique wheels and interior trim | 2014+ cars get the Quick Shift transmission update for crisper shifts |
| T6 Platinum | Ventilated seats, upgraded audio, adaptive cruise | Worth it if you actually use the tech, otherwise skip |
| Inscription (2016+) | Stretched wheelbase, extra rear legroom, massaging front seats | Rear-seat space if you regularly carry adult passengers |
| Polestar | Performance suspension, brakes, and engine tune | Only if you want a factory-tuned sport sedan; insurance and parts cost more |
| S60 Cross Country (2016+) | 2.5 inches of extra ground clearance, standard AWD, skid plates | Niche pick; inspect the underbody for damage from actual off-pavement use |
The 2014 model year revised the R-Design's seat bolsters and added the Quick Shift module to the automatic transmission, sharpening shift response on cars equipped with it. Everything built before that shares the same core hardware with about two dozen software updates layered on top, according to owner threads comparing early and late R-Design cars.
R-Design and Inscription split the lineup's personality in two directions rather than one being strictly better. Owners on SwedeSpeed comparing the two describe Inscription's seats as flatter and more comfortable on long drives, with a massaging function and ventilation not offered on R-Design, while R-Design keeps the firmer sport seats, unique wheels, and a noticeably stiffer ride. Neither is rare on the used market, but Inscription only exists from 2016 on, so if you want the stretched-wheelbase rear seat space, your year range narrows to the generation's cleanest complaint years by default.
Which Model Years to Target Within This Gen
| Year | Recalls | Key Changes | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2 | Launch year; T5 I5 / T6 I6 only | Caution |
| 2012 | 4 | Same powertrains; highest complaint volume of the generation | Caution |
| 2013 | 0 new | Continued I5/I6; engine complaints still elevated | Caution |
| 2014 | data not indexed | Quick Shift transmission update, R-Design seat revision | Good value if inspected |
| 2015 | 0 | Drive-E four introduced mid-year; Polestar debuts with I6 | Good, verify engine by build date |
| 2016 | 0 | Cross Country debuts; I6 phased out by year's end | Good |
| 2017 | 0 | Full Drive-E lineup; Inscription trim; Polestar switches to I4 | Best complaint record |
| 2018 | data not indexed | Final year before full redesign | Best overall |
2012 carries this generation's worst safety and complaint record: four NHTSA recalls, including a fuel pump software issue that could stall the engine and a fuel line connector defect with a fire risk, plus 121 total complaints in CarScout's NHTSA-sourced data, 43 of them engine-related. 2011 shares two of those four recalls (the oil-pressure alert fix and a minor spare-tire label correction) but wasn't tracked separately in the complaint counts above. 2013 improves only modestly, still logging 85 total complaints and 28 engine-related ones, evidence that the fixes issued for 2012 didn't fully resolve the underlying oil consumption pattern owners were reporting on forums. By 2017, total complaints had fallen to 15, with only one tagged as engine-related. If you're choosing between years and nothing else separates two cars, the newer one in this range is the safer bet. CarScout doesn't carry per-year market data for 2011, 2014, or 2018, so those rows above reflect what's verifiable and what isn't rather than a guess.
Pre-Purchase Inspection Checklist
If it's a T5 (2.5L I5, 2011-2016):
- Ask for timing belt and water pump records. If there's no proof of a belt change within 120,000 miles or 10 years, budget $850 to $1,200 for it regardless of how good the rest of the car looks.
- Start the engine cold and listen for a whistling noise from the engine bay. That's the classic sign of a failing PCV oil trap, not an expensive fix on its own, but worth negotiating on.
- Check the oil level against the dipstick history if the seller has it. A quart low every 1,000 miles points to piston ring wear that a PCV fix won't solve.
If it's a T6 (3.0L I6, 2011-2016):
- Ask specifically whether Volvo service campaign S49642 (Haldex Differential Electronic Module recalibration) was completed on 2013-2015 cars. It won't show up on a standard recall check since it's a service campaign, not a safety recall.
- Drive it and listen for the AWD system engaging smoothly under acceleration from a stop. Chattering or a dash warning for "AWD malfunction" points to a neglected Haldex fluid service.
If it's a Drive-E four-cylinder (2015.5-2018):
- Confirm which engine is actually under the hood via the door jamb sticker, especially on 2015 and 2016 cars where both the old and new engines were built in the same model year.
- Test the Sensus infotainment screen through a full drive cycle. Owners on SwedeSpeed and Volvo Forums report freezes and reboots on 2017 cars specifically; a soft reset (holding the home button 20-30 seconds) is the standard workaround, not a fix.
On every P3-platform S60, regardless of engine:
- Check for water intrusion around the Central Electronic Module under the dash, caused by blocked sunroof or roof-rail drain tubes. Symptoms include random warning lights, window malfunctions, and instrument cluster glitches that won't reproduce on demand.
- Listen for squeaking from the rear wheel wells during a test drive over bumps. That's the rear trailing arm bushings, a labor-intensive fix since they're integrated into the rear knuckle.
Run every VIN through a recall check before you commit. Only ask a seller to confirm completion of the specific campaigns listed above for the exact model year you're buying.
Running Costs
| Powertrain | Combined MPG | Key Maintenance Items | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| T5 2.5L I5 (2011-2016) | 23-24 | Timing belt + water pump at 120k/10yr, PCV oil trap | Highest scheduled-maintenance cost in the lineup |
| T6 3.0L I6 (2011-2016) | 21 | Timing chain (no belt), Haldex fluid service | Thirstier but fewer forced maintenance intervals |
| T5/T6 Drive-E I4 (2015.5-2018) | 25-30 | Timing chain, occasional PCV oil trap | Best fuel economy of the generation |
RepairPal rates the S60 3.5 out of 5.0 for reliability, ranking 11th out of 31 luxury midsize cars, with an average annual repair cost of $750. Severity of individual repairs runs low; it's frequency, not catastrophic failures, that drives most owners' complaints. Volvo S60 owners bring their car in for an unscheduled repair about 0.5 times a year on average, per RepairPal's data, close to the luxury midsize segment norm.
Budget beyond the basics too. A PCV oil trap repair runs $139 to $475. A T5's timing belt and water pump service runs $850 to $1,200 and needs to happen on a schedule regardless of how the car drives. Haldex fluid service on AWD cars isn't part of a standard oil change and gets skipped often enough that it's worth asking about directly rather than assuming it's covered by "full service history." None of these are engine-out repairs, but they add up faster than the sticker price of a $9,000 used S60 might suggest.
FAQ
Is the 2011-2018 Volvo S60 reliable? It depends heavily on the engine and year. The T6 inline-6 (2011-2016) has a strong reputation for durability, while the T5 inline-5 has documented oil consumption and PCV issues. Complaint volume drops sharply after 2013, making 2015-2018 cars the more consistently reliable pick.
What year Volvo S60 should I avoid? 2012 carries this generation's worst record: four NHTSA recalls and 121 total complaints in CarScout's data, 43 of them engine-related, the highest of any year in the generation. 2011 and 2013 also run above the generation's later-year average.
Is the Volvo S60 T5 or T6 better? The T6's inline-6 (2011-2016) has the stronger reliability reputation and needs no timing belt. The T5's inline-5 is cheaper to insure and slightly more efficient but carries a mandatory belt service and more reported oil consumption complaints in forum threads.
How many miles does a Volvo S60 P3 last? Well-maintained T6 examples regularly pass 150,000 miles with routine service, per owner threads on SwedeSpeed and Matthews Volvo Site. T5 longevity varies more by maintenance history, particularly whether the timing belt was replaced on schedule and whether oil changes stayed on top of any early oil consumption.
What is Volvo S60 Drive-E and is it reliable? Drive-E is Volvo's turbocharged four-cylinder engine family, phased in starting mid-2015 and standard across the lineup by 2017. It replaced the older inline-5 and inline-6 engines, runs a timing chain instead of a belt, and shows a sharp drop in NHTSA engine complaints compared to the earlier engines in CarScout's data.
Bottom Line
Target a 2016 or 2017 T6 Drive-E: the AWD security of the six-cylinder era without the belt service of the T5, plus the cleanest complaint record in the generation. Whatever year you land on, confirm the actual engine against the door jamb sticker if you're looking at a 2015 or 2016 car, and run the VIN through a recall check before you commit to anything from 2011 or 2012. CarScout checks the used market daily and emails you a digest when something matching your spec shows up, so you can track this generation's dwindling clean examples without refreshing listing sites yourself.
Footer
Data sourced from NHTSA's recall and complaint databases via CarScout's market intelligence pipeline, EPA fuel economy data, and real owner experiences from SwedeSpeed, Matthews Volvo Site, Volvo Forums (volvoforums.com), and FCP Euro's P3 chassis buyer's guide. See the full Volvo S60 market data for pricing and inventory.